Theory of Eternity
THEORY OF ETERNITY
WILLIAM DEAN ZITTERKOPF II
2325 6TH AVE
SCOTTSBLUFF, NE 69361
(308) 635-1385
THEORY OF ETERNITY
WILLIAM DEAN ZITTERKOPF II
-Interpretation of the cognitive subconscious begins with volitionary ascertainment that nescient cogitation exists in parallel to compos mentis subliminal ideology. Unanimous ostensible metaphysical apprehension requires acquiesce acknowledgment and perspicuous comprehension to provide the aptitude available for conscious illumination. Therefore, if the conscious psyche is perceptive of the subconscious functionality, then could the subconscious be cognizant of the conscious thoughts? Indeed, but substantiating vindication of magnitudes such as this obligates acquisition demands that can only be fulfilled by existential understandings unspoken in atmospheres typically unfamiliar with introspectively and scrupulously investigating reciprocity between "how", "where", "when", and "why". Explanations pertaining to these ideologies have been pursued since consciousness became perceptive to its surroundings.
By extensively complicating theology, constrictive limitations are placed on even the simplest concepts of ideology. The lack of bias on the theological perceptions of the past will allow for the expansion of ideology of the future. The elements of time require establishment of a start and completion through a finish. Resulting from the inabilities to define an initial beginning and lack of conscious perception to comprehend or anticipate a finish, ideology of eternity will be described, initially, as a complete separation of conscious and subconscious examination of what seems to be real. The lack of explanation for concepts of eternity allow for reevaluation of the connectedness between thought and realism. Sub-atomic particles conform to chemicals that exchange charges composed of protons, neutrons, and electrons. These exchange processes take place between more complex systems that are perceived to create conscious introspection. But what created these elements thought to be results of randomness and chance? If when, were they ever created? If believed to conform from randomness and chance, then what could provide a logical explanation for cognizance of the subconscious? Is it possible this relationship between the conscious and subconscious also occur relating to exchanges occurring between subconscious and conscious?
Rather than aggregating the assertion that there is a complete separation of conscious and subconscious, examination of further possible occurrences must take place. Resulting from bodily functions discontinuing (charged particle exchange subsiding), and "consciousness as perceived" conceding, two phases of consciousness are proposed to exist, (yet functioning independently), must co-exist. Thus being: consciousness that pertains to worldly stimulation assumed to be incorporated into most brain functionality and associated with perceived subconscious; and continuation of consciousness that corresponds with ubiquitous subconscious by undergoing transubstantiation, becoming cognitive subconscious. Initiation and complete translation of cognitive subconscious will result in sublimation to Absolute subconscious. Therefore, the superseding subconscious will eternally function in coordination with this 3rd level of subconscious now being referred to as Absolute subconscious; each level being interconnected at a higher level of continuum and magnitude now identified as Absolute cognizance.
It may then be assumed that this Absolute subconscious is communicating both directly and indirectly with each and every eternal level of even more distant and extensive, yet inter-related superseding subconscious by translating these "thoughts" through continual channels of "energy" between all identified states of consciousness. Yet, identifying the sources of these thoughts and energies must be even further examined, and potentially identified. (See Illustration 1) 
An undeniable perception that dreams are reflections of reality may be accepted by any conscious mind. But for one to claim that reality is "simply a reflection of various chimeras" is a much harder concept to latch onto. Absolute subconscious existentially interrelated with Absolute cognizance exerting unsurpassable influence on multiple cognitive subconscious may be interpreted as the mechanism for this abstract reasoning. Perceived consciousness, (influenced by perceived subconscious, as well as earthly stimulation), is instantaneously affected by acts of reasoning created by what will now be referred to as Absolute Cognizant Subconscious. This prerogative leverage is passed through the cognitive subconscious by this mechanism known as the superseding subconscious. Thus being said, this hierarchy being described could be the mechanism by which perceived reality is in fact predetermined. But what does this catalyst for communication between perceived cognizance and Absolute Cognizant Subconscious represent? What is the reasoning for interchange of this nature? Could free will, in all reality, be disposed acquiescence? By incorporating thoughts such as this, with knowledge of the Absolute Cognizant Subconscious, one can appropriately assess this concept of interrelatedness between perceived conscious, now defined as Absolute Cognizant Subconscious.
An additional concept to the ideologies previously discussed comes to thought. With introspection of perceived consciousness having direct relationships with multiple perceived subconscious (or to another level, cognitive subconscious), this event must also occur in a "reverse," or transposed direction. Could it be that the cognitive subconscious in fact has direct ties with miscellaneous perceived subconscious extending to scattered or assorted perceived consciousness? But what influences would cause this "crossed circuitry"? This transcendental approach could very possibly be the explanation for mental "disorders" such as multiple personalities, or schizophrenia. And also, what decisive influence would permit the perceived consciousness to determine whether these occurrences are being interchanged in both directions? Therein an even deeper yet "simple" concept to examine remains. "Simple", when explored in most dictionaries, has complexities defining infinite possibilities. By allowing the majority of simplicities to become so overly complicated, the concepts theorized by complexity may be simply identified. This conflicting synergy is, even while overlapping pathways may exist. Overlay of connection typically results in discontinuation of passageways, yet it seems these transmissions seem to progress and develop higher energy, allowing the cognitive subconscious to continue this communication with innumerable perceived subconscious. (See Illustration 2)
Identification and clarification of "direction" must now take place. Direction is indicated by location at time of perception. If perception is altered or is influenced by parallels of perceived subconscious/consciousness, concept of direction is manipulated. Relocation or transposition of perceived subconscious may reflect this alteration in determining direction. By incapacitating perception and forcing inhibition upon perceived consciousness, perceived subconscious is re-examined and acted upon. The Absolute cognizant subconscious has the capabilities to impose any concepts necessary for clarification to the perceived subconscious, which has been appointed to relate information to perceived consciousness. Perceived subconscious, is in fact only deciphering what is perceived to be. Extreme complexities cause the perceived subconscious to enact on the cognitive subconscious for compensation in determining possible interpretations of imposed requests or demands of Absolute Cognizant Subconscious. Superseding subconscious pathways allow communication to be delivered by methods not comprehendible by any of the levels of subconscious, including the perceived consciousness. The superseding subconscious, due to mistranslation (inability to passively communicate without complication) of elements within Absolute Cognizant Subconscious, is bypassed. By way of omnipotent/omniscient perception and anticipation of such situation, superseding and cognizant subconscious becomes invalid. Absolute Cognizant Subconscious imposes directly on perceived subconscious that in turn is comprehendible by the perceived consciousness. At this point, communication between perceived consciousness and Absolute Cognizant Subconscious is obtained, and assumed necessity for subconscious thought is eliminated. With accomplishing the ultimate achievement of conscious communication with the Absolute Cognizant Subconscious, understanding of what "is" seems to be obtainable, but remains incomprehensible. Only through undetermined reason and conceptuality undefined, directness is minimized between perceived consciousness and Absolute Cognizant Subconscious. Affliction, confusion, determination, expectation, and allowable perception all come to be as a result of conceptualities becoming of surpassed communication or reduced interaction from Absolute Cognizant Subconscious. Unfathomable reasoning known by and ability to inflict limitless results upon are acknowledged and accepted by all perceived, cognizant, and superseding subconscious/consciousness. Finite to none, unity results in Omniscience, Omnipresence, and Omnipotence, only able and accomplished by this highest level, Absolute Cognizant Subconscious.
Now, evaluate the theology that energy may be created or destroyed. Varying levels, phases, and elements of energy are thought to be separate, but interact with a multitude of outcomes. But what created this energy? Some theologies believe energy is never created nor destroyed. Is there a centralized source "producing" eternal amounts of this energy? Or is it possible this energy always was, is, and always will be? Vast quantities of solar "systems" have recently been identified to exist beyond the realm of what was once thought of to be singular. In fact, the earth was once perceived to be flat. By starting with a widely accepted theory that as replication of specific nucleic acids occur, over time the mechanisms that cause these combinations of sulfur, hydrogen, and phosphorus to remain intact just simply appear to lose their ability to maintain affinity. But what if it were a consistent cycle throughout the "universe"? Many astronomers have been subjected to the hypothesis that the "sun" is the center of universe that contains collections of matter referred to as Earth. Begin with the "big-bang" theory for initial elaboration. Plasma assumed to fill the space between carbon-based materials may function as the transmission method for this energy to be circulated throughout this universe. But as the universe is expanding, there has been no consideration as to where this plasma is coming from, or how it is conforming to continually fill these voids that result from massive expansion. There is also no theory pertaining to what may have caused the initial rotation of the solar systems to begin.
Evolutionary biology may suggest that even the "simplest" of amino acids were mysteriously collecting in a randomly saturated solution. Theoretically, high levels of energy may have provided the necessary framework for this helical formation to begin. But no consideration has been given to the concept of enzyme generation necessary for nucleic acid degradation, or enzymatic evolution necessary for nucleic acid formation and compatibility. Is it possible the lost affinity of genetic material follows consistent models of the universal code? From simple observation of energy produced by heavenly bodies, therein lies another question. Where in historical theory does the term heavenly arise? Firmament and heavenly pertain to "vault of heaven", or "coming from the heaven of God", yet the term "God" is eliminated from all historical research of evolutionary processes. Could it be possible these naïve theories have been developed without open-minded possibilities? Creation is shunned by many evolutionary biologists, yet cannot be disproven. As these solar components are observed, they appear to begin by expanding and occupying a larger amount of this space between what is. As expansion continues, there is an apparent observation of retraction. The gas composing these heavenly bodies begins to draw towards the center of this rotation. Once maximum compaction of matter centralizes, the process repeats itself, therefore another "big-bang" could occur. This is not a suggestion that "big-banging" could potentially fill the void of current gap-education.
Discussions dealing with further examination of multiple universal systematics require additional clarification. Certain theological proposals may suggest a single heavenly body or "star" interpreted by perceived consciousness by projection of visual energies towards matter referred to as "earth", is in fact representation of these individual systems. Ancient and more recent systematic proposals or hypotheses have demonstrated and determined these abstractions are in fact just that: rational surmise and supposition. Theory is accepted if it simply cannot be disproven. Therein lays a much more extensive and continually overlooked issue. If theory is accepted on the sole concept that it cannot be disproven, why is it that no one has proposed an idea that the fate of the earth is in the hands of elephants, or Darwin's finches? Perceived consciousness and subconscious are far too feeble to even attempt to attack an extremely extensive topic of this magnitude, yet it will be attempted, and potentially explained.
Superseding subconscious may play the role of mediator for the purpose of examining multiple personalities or capability to determine such awareness. If Absolute Cognizant Subconscious can influence and in fact predetermine perception as we know it, existence of the ACS is necessary to explain accessibility issues pertaining to infinite and various levels of cognition, giving arise to and providing confirmation of concepts of multiple interaction between ACS and all levels of cognizance. If the ACS has the capabilities to interact directly with each quantum of understanding, or lack thereof, what would necessitate mediation between variances in acumen, or voids in understanding? If gaps occur, or if awareness of differing levels of cognizance (conscious/subconscious) develops, comprehension of surroundings may give rise to other categories necessary for explanation, thus being enlightenment of such predisposition. When transmission is manifested independently by varying levels of achievement throughout the hierarchy of such understanding, mediation between ACS and cognitive subconscious becomes no longer necessary for communication between superseding subconscious and perceived subconscious. If barriers are broken between vital mediators, excessive influence may occur. By the ACS "allowing" superseding subconscious to transmit directly to perceived subconscious, understanding provided by cognitive subconscious is bypassed and this variance can be achieved.
Once the perceived subconscious is acted upon directly by the superseding subconscious, cognitive subconscious no longer has capabilities to decipher information necessary for proper consideration by perceived subconscious. When this bypass occurs, differing conceptions are available for interpretation, or deprivation of such capabilities. Minimal interaction between cross-circuitry of said conceptualities provides groundwork for confusion, confrontation, and complication between defined perceived conscious/subconscious. Determined by perception between various perceived conscious, interaction occurs and causes increase in activity between perceived conscious and cognitive subconscious. This perception of perceived conscious by cognitive subconscious is affected and ultimately interacts with multiple perceived subconscious that in turn relates transmissions to infinite perceived subconscious. Infinite interaction is also not limited to just one perceived conscious, but rather communicates with unlimited perceived conscious. When perceived conscious complicates interactions by denying or delaying communication with one, or multiple perceived subconscious, interaction between perceived conscious and perceived subconscious is prohibited and cognitive subconscious is denied communication with said perceived subconscious. Elimination of processes necessary for analytical function by perceived conscious causes action to be taken without prevision provided by either perceived subconscious or cognitive subconscious. Regulation then causes action to be taken by perceived conscious before interpretation by appropriate hierarchal systems, or cognizant evaluation of such information occurs, will result in destruction of perceived conscious eliminating communication with perceived subconscious. This being a representation of action taking place with no prior thought to evaluate right or wrong, or various outcomes becoming as a result of conscious-lacking decision making.
If outward influence on development of perceived conscious/subconscious is eliminated, obtaining a closer communicable position to Absolute Cognizant Subconscious is obtained. When perceived subconscious is no longer necessary for evaluation of stimulations delivered from perceived conscious, there occurs reduction in hierarchical displacement between said tenses. Once perceived subconscious is no longer, cognitive subconscious has a direct relationship to perceived conscious, which decreases necessity for intervention previously provided by perceived subconscious. (See Illustration 3)
Now, cognitive subconscious has ordained unambiguous administration for transmission between perceived conscious and ACS. Upon designation of unambiguous administration, cognitive subconscious has a direct affect on adjunct resolutions performed by perceived conscious. Achieving this hierarchical reduction of previous disposition is a result of consensual acknowledgement that ACS does exist, and this decision-making ability is completely influenced by susceptible willingness and inclination simply to recognize extraordinarily cogent ascendancy. Potentially, further omission of possible cognate levels of understanding occur allowing ACS to directly relate to perceived conscious, further eliminating necessity for deciphering of communicational abilities between unequal levels of aptitude. Eliminating these previous requirements allows this predisposition to be further impacting relationships between ACS and perceived conscious, reducing the necessity for more advanced decision making, and increasing forethought capabilities of perceived conscious.
Returning to previously discussed concepts of chimeras being influenced by Absolute Cognitive, superseding, cognitive, and perceived subconscious is extensively discussed further as methods of analytical abilities are extensively expanded and complicated. When dreams occur, perceived subconscious interprets these "thoughts" and undergoes 1st person decipherability efforts. Upon awakening from "sleep", perceived subconscious attempts to break down and interpret interactions between elevated levels in this hierarchical arrangement. Ideology previously suggested herein that Absolute Cognitive, superseding, cognitive, and perceived subconscious having direct influence on perceived conscious plays a very important role in this conceptual discussion. Expanding possibilities and considerations that ASCS provide cosignificative interpretations for quandaries involved between both perceived conscious and perceived subconscious allows for ideology that 2nd and 3rd person comprehension of dreams may be achieved and possibly established. These 1st, 2nd, and 3rd level interpretations can be defined as: 1st - perceived subconscious interacting with perceived conscious; 2nd - Cognitive subconscious communicating with perceived conscious; 3rd - Superseding subconscious providing awareness between all 3 (perceived conscious, perceived subconscious, and cognitive subconscious); and even possibly a 4th level of understanding providing awareness for perceived conscious attentively responding to ACS attempts to create interactions with perceived conscious. (See Illustration 4)
Simply said, "... we dream, we consciously think about our dream, we dream within a dream to analytically interpret the same dream, and we analyze our interpretations of dreams while dreaming to explain the original dream."
Understand that neuroticism and psychosis are entirely and differently associated to one another than disorders previously discussed. Psychosis can be described as building sand castles; neuroticism can then be illustrated as living in these sandcastles that are imagined to exist. Paranoia is created by the perceived subconscious incorrectly communicating with cognitive subconscious and perceived consciousness. When this occurs, evaluation of information attempted to be delivered becomes twisted (crossed-circutry) and improperly manipulated. Many different levels of neuroticism may exist. Possibly incorporating narcissistic and psychotic features or peculiarities, opportunities for both disorders may arise simultaneously. With complete disregard for subconscious thought, whether perceived or cognizant, perceived consciousness seeks out or determines which individual or multiple subconscious it will be directly associated with. Another atypical eccentric feature of both abnormalities listed above is the functions controlled and determined by perceived conscious thought. A possible interaction by all levels may be as follows; by denying the fact that an individual knows what is wrong, yet disregards what is evaluated to be incorrect, different levels of said disorders arise and may exist outside realms of perceived conscious/subconscious and are simultaneously interacting with multiple cognitive subconscious. This could very possibly be further explaining crossed-circuitry discussed above.